General Resources / Legal Resources / Medical
Resources / Briefing Papers / State Activity
Hospital Closures / Preventable
Tragedies / Press Room / Search
Our Site / Home
Fact Sheet
MEDICAID DISCRIMINATION AGAINST PEOPLE
WITH SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESSES
"Increasingly, individuals with
mental illnesses are left to fend for themselves on the streets, where they victimize
others or, more frequently, are victimized themselves. Eventually, many wind up in prison,
where the likelihood of treatment is nearly as remote."
---Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan in the Congressional Record, July 12, 1999
- The widespread introduction of the first, effective anti-psychotic medication
chlorpromazine, or Thorazine, in 1955 launched deinstitutionalization, the moving of
patients out of psychiatric hospital settings and into the community. The pace of
deinstitutionalization accelerated significantly following the enactment of Medicaid and
Medicare in 1965. While in state hospitals, patients were the fiscal responsibility of the
states, but by discharging them, the states effectively shifted the majority of that
responsibility to the federal government.
Discriminatory Provision
- When enacting Medicaid, the federal government specifically excluded payments for
patients in state psychiatric hospitals and other "institutions for mental
diseases," or IMDs, to accomplish two goals: 1) to foster deinstitutionalization; and
2) to shift the costs back to the states which were viewed by the federal government as
traditionally responsible for such care. States proceeded to transfer massive numbers of
patients from state hospitals to nursing homes and the community where Medicaid
reimbursement was available. ("[t]he term institution for mental diseases
means a hospital, nursing facility, or other institution of more than 16 beds, that is
primarily engaged in providing diagnosis, treatment, or care of persons with mental
diseases, including medical attention, nursing care, and related services." 42 U.S.C.
§1396d(i))
- Indigent persons who need treatment in a hospital can count on Medicaid to pay for
diseases of the heart, liver, blood and most other body organs. Medicaid will not cover
the individual if he or she is between the ages of 21 and 65, has a disease in his or her
brain and needs care in a psychiatric hospital. The Federal governments IMD
Exclusion prohibits Medicaid from covering any treatment (even non-psychiatric) in
state and private psychiatric hospitals and other IMDs.
- For the most severely mentally ill, private insurance is essentially meaningless.
Because of their illnesses, most individuals with the severest forms of brain disease are
unemployed and private insurance is a luxury they cannot afford. While the federal
government seeks "parity" for treatment of lesser forms of mental illness by
private insurers, it continues to discriminate against those with severe mental illnesses
by denying them coverage under Medicaid when they require hospitalization in a psychiatric
hospital.
State Reimbursement
- The federal government reimburses states for between 50 and 80 percent of treatment
under Medicaid. Because treatment in an IMD is excluded from Medicaid reimbursement, the
states have a significant fiscal incentive to limit treatment in psychiatric hospitals.
This is the driving force behind deinstitutionalization as states seek to push patients
out of the hospitals and into Medicaid-eligible services where the federal government
picks up most of the cost, even though treatment may be unsatisfactory, more costly and
less effective.
Hospital Closures
- Approximately 500,000 individuals were in inpatient psychiatric care in state
psychiatric hospitals when the Medicaid program started, compared with fewer than 60,000
in 1999. Hospital closures have actually accelerated in recent years. Forty state
hospitals completely shut their doors between 1990 and 1997, nearly three times as many as
during the entire period from 1970 to 1990, and many more closures are planned.
- As state psychiatric hospitals improved in quality, it became increasingly common to
discharge patients from relatively good hospitals with active rehabilitation programs and transinstitutionalize
them to nursing homes, general hospitals or similar institutions with markedly inferior
psychiatric care and no rehabilitation programs at all. States save state funds, but
transinstitutionalized patients pay a substantial price for the substandard care.
- Costs in general hospitals are generally $200 per day more than the costs in public
psychiatric hospitals. These additional costs are of little consequence to the states
since federal Medicaid dollars are paying the majority of the bill; the states costs
are lower and that is the limit of their concern. Unfortunately, evidence shows that
general hospitals admit psychiatric patients with less severe illnesses, but turn away
those who are more seriously ill. Inpatient stays for people with serious brain disorders
are typically shorter in general hospitals, which compromises the persons ability to
stabilize on medication.
Consequences of Discrimination
- Medicaids denial of coverage results in homelessness, incarceration, victimization
and even death for many people who are so ill they are unable to care for themselves. Of
the 4 million Americans with schizophrenia and manic-depression, approximately 50 percent (2
million) are not being treated on any given day. By the Justice Department's own
statistics, there are currently about 283,800 mentally ill people locked up in the
nation's jails and prisons. The Los Angeles County Jail and New York's Riker's Island are
currently the two largest "treatment facilities" for the mentally ill in the
country. Another 150,000 to 200,000 mentally ill are homeless, and 28 percent get at least
some of their meals from garbage cans. More than ten percent will die from suicide. Others
will commit acts of violence against family, friends and total strangers.
general
resources | legal resources | medical
resources | briefing papers | state activity
hospital closures | preventable
tragedies | press room | search
| home

Treatment Advocacy
Center
|
The contents of TAC's website are copyrighted by the Treatment Advocacy Center unless otherwise indicated. All rights reserved and content may be reproduced, downloaded, disseminated, or transferred, for single use, or by nonprofit organizations for educational purposes only, if correct attribution is made. TAC is an I.R.C. § 501(c)(3) tax-exempt corporation. Donations are appreciated and are eligible for the charitable contribution deduction under the provisions of I.R.C. § 170. Please note that TAC does not accept funding from pharmaceutical companies or entities involved in the sale, marketing, or distribution of such products.
|